Uncategorized

Who Owns The ‘Stolen’ Mandate? — Keyamo Queries

Tinubu/Shettima Presidential Campaign Council spokesman Festus Keyamo questioned the Nigerian people about the owner of the money order allegedly stolen as a result of the general election. system in 2023.
Keyamo, who is also Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Labor, and Employment, said Saturday that under criminal law,  property theft can only happen if there is a previous owner.

He, therefore, asked the Labor Party (LP) presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and his counterpart in the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), Atiku Abubakar, to hold the supposed mandate. stole.

Taking to Twitter on Saturday night, Keyamo wrote:
“In criminal law, theft can only happen if the property has an owner. ONLY QUESTION:
Between Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi, who holds the alleged “stolen” money order? Check out the comments below to see which ones can’t answer a simple question.

It should be remembered that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has declared Bola Ahmed Tinubu of the Progressive All-People’s Congress the winner of the presidential election on February 25.

PDP’s Atiku is second while LP’s Peter Obi is third in the polls respectively.

However, both Atiku and Obi denied the election results and vowed to get their “stolen mission” back through the Electoral Complaints Court.

In another tweet, Nigeria’s chief lawyer said that despite INEC’s claim of victory, the opposition continues “to spread baseless allegations aimed at discrediting the term of the President-elect. I have refuted these baseless claims from time to time and this is what they interpret as “our post-victory campaign”.

“No, it’s not a campaign. He defends our duty against lies. In fact, they want us to shut up when they’re frantic with their lies. They found us hard to crack! »

READ ALSO:  Election results: Gbajabiamila praises voters for historic victory for 6th term  

Speaking about the allegedly leaked audio clip involving Obi and Bishop David Oyedepo of Living Faith Church, he said:

Peter Obi waited for 5 GOOD DAYS to observe whether the ‘yes-daddy’ audio would be very damaging or not to him before commenting on it and when he confirmed it had ended his political career, he tweeted a very WEAK DENIAL.

“Before then, he used to tweet every day or every other day, but this time he did not tweet about the audio for 5 DAYS. On the 4th day, he first avoided it and tweeted about the accusation Lai Mohammed made THAT SAME DAY in Washington DC, without commenting on the ‘yes-daddy’ audio that was already four days old on that day. It was when there was an avalanche of criticisms by Nigerians of ducking the main issue that he then tweeted his weak denial on the fifth day. Wayo man!Nigerians are not fools!”

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button